Nepalese leaders ' great mistake
Constitution of each nation should be like the heart of people. When the heart stops working, human life ends. Every citizen of nation should feel proud of it. They have to feel proud of it. But in Nepal for the sake of leaders Nepalese leaders did whatever they liked. Was it fair to declare the constitution without people consensus? In my reading the the Dilli's contract in 2062 between the Maoists leaders and other leaders ignoring Nepal was totally irrational agreement it's because general Nepalese were the victims of political parties' activities. On the one hand the Maoists were revolutionary groups they were killing teachers,, politicians, security forces and their families and general public, destroyed infrastructure of development on the other hand other political parties were misusing the power and killed the Maoists' cadres. Both activities were inhuman and regrettable. The declaration of secular country and federalism without consensus or Nepalese and without informing to Nepalese was unfair.
During the time of writing constitution, if I had right to say or cast to vote I was against federalism. I have already written that federalism and secularism would be the never ending virus which would infect Nepal forever. What my conscience used to say that is seen around our political scenario and justifying the same matter. I need a united Nepal but not divided. I do believe unity is the strength. I believe in decentralization of power. A citizen should get his\her passport from the concerned ward no of his\her municipality or Village Development Committee. Even today Singhdurbar is not access to the general public. They have to cross the bar to reach there. Subaltern do not have access there.
In the past the present leaders of Nepal used to deliver speech against the king. In their reading the kings were white elephants and useless but should be fed with so heavy fodder. When the king used to come out of the palace there was jam and even walking on the road was forbidden. Therefore, king should be abolished they said and had already been de-throne too. But can general public find the differences between the past and present rulers? Is there not traffic jam in the street? Why present rulers also did the same as the king did. Was your dream fulfilled or not? Have you not seen the pauper in front of your eyes? Why are you spending so huge amount of money for leaders treatment but general public are deprived of cetamol? Is it fair?
Even for the sake of Nepal and Nepalese there must be referendum for or against Nepal as federal state and ‘Nepal as a Hindu kingdom or secular state. If not, the leaders who declared Nepal as a secular the human casualties. If not why they did so, they have to convince Nepalese. What was their compulsion for this declaration?
Maintaining peace and increasing the feelings of fraternity is the present demand of Nepal and Nepalese. There must be rapid development in economic growth.
2073-08-17
Constitution of each nation should be like the heart of people. When the heart stops working, human life ends. Every citizen of nation should feel proud of it. They have to feel proud of it. But in Nepal for the sake of leaders Nepalese leaders did whatever they liked. Was it fair to declare the constitution without people consensus? In my reading the the Dilli's contract in 2062 between the Maoists leaders and other leaders ignoring Nepal was totally irrational agreement it's because general Nepalese were the victims of political parties' activities. On the one hand the Maoists were revolutionary groups they were killing teachers,, politicians, security forces and their families and general public, destroyed infrastructure of development on the other hand other political parties were misusing the power and killed the Maoists' cadres. Both activities were inhuman and regrettable. The declaration of secular country and federalism without consensus or Nepalese and without informing to Nepalese was unfair.
During the time of writing constitution, if I had right to say or cast to vote I was against federalism. I have already written that federalism and secularism would be the never ending virus which would infect Nepal forever. What my conscience used to say that is seen around our political scenario and justifying the same matter. I need a united Nepal but not divided. I do believe unity is the strength. I believe in decentralization of power. A citizen should get his\her passport from the concerned ward no of his\her municipality or Village Development Committee. Even today Singhdurbar is not access to the general public. They have to cross the bar to reach there. Subaltern do not have access there.
In the past the present leaders of Nepal used to deliver speech against the king. In their reading the kings were white elephants and useless but should be fed with so heavy fodder. When the king used to come out of the palace there was jam and even walking on the road was forbidden. Therefore, king should be abolished they said and had already been de-throne too. But can general public find the differences between the past and present rulers? Is there not traffic jam in the street? Why present rulers also did the same as the king did. Was your dream fulfilled or not? Have you not seen the pauper in front of your eyes? Why are you spending so huge amount of money for leaders treatment but general public are deprived of cetamol? Is it fair?
Even for the sake of Nepal and Nepalese there must be referendum for or against Nepal as federal state and ‘Nepal as a Hindu kingdom or secular state. If not, the leaders who declared Nepal as a secular the human casualties. If not why they did so, they have to convince Nepalese. What was their compulsion for this declaration?
Maintaining peace and increasing the feelings of fraternity is the present demand of Nepal and Nepalese. There must be rapid development in economic growth.
2073-08-17
No comments:
Post a Comment